Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Info

Contents

Table of Contents

This page was last modified on 20 August 201327 January 2022, at 1311:0155.

Basic information

A parasite infection of red blood cells, transmitted to humans by a particular type of mosquito (Anopheles) that is prevalent in rural tropical and sub-tropical settings.

Types

There are five known species of Plasmodium parasites that infect humans:

  • falciparum
  • vivax
  • ovale
  • malariae
  • knowlesi

Individual at risk

Recipient

Risk factors for malaria in healthy donors

  1. Recent travel – i.e. a history of visiting a malaria risk area within a defined time period prior to assessment.
    • Most guidelines define a time period of 12 months or less, though a period of up to 3 years may be utilised in order to cover an extended risk of relapsing vivax infection and/or to comply with European guidelines relating to unexplained fevers occurring after “tropical” travel.
  2. Past infection – i.e. a known history of previous malaria infection.
    • In the context of young volunteer HPC donors, this can be defined simply as any malaria diagnosis at any time of life.
  3. Past residence – i.e. a history of previous residence in a malaria risk area.
    • Most commonly defined as a continuous period of 6 months or longer.
    • European guidelines attribute risk to residence at any stage of life, but the highest risk occurs with repeated exposures from early childhood.

A donor who has recently travelled to a malaria risk area can develop symptomless malaria infection in situations like relapsing P. vivax infection and incomplete treatment with prophylactic anti-malarial medications.

A donor with a previous history of malaria infection can pose a risk to HPC recipients through semi-immunity or partial immunity to malaria – particularly if infected during childhood, which can occur without clear symptoms or a specific diagnosis.

A semi-immune individual remains susceptible to new malaria infection, but will be less likely to develop severe illness.  In some cases, a semi-immune individual can develop prolonged symptomless infection after re-exposure to malaria, posing a risk to recipients if they donate blood or HPCs.

Malaria antibody testing, where available, can be useful in evaluating the risk of symptomless malaria in a healthy donor with a history of potential malaria exposure – especially the risk associated with malaria semi-immunity, which accounts for the overwhelming majority of cases of reported and potential transmission of malaria via blood products.

Note that regulations such as the European Directive for blood and tissues set a 4-month window period for malaria antibody testing, but the true window period is likely to be closer to 2 weeks.

Guidance at RECRUITMENT

  1. Recent travel:
    • Any travel to a malaria risk area within the past 12 months.
    • ACCEPTABLE.

  2. Past infection:
    • A known history of malaria infection at any time of life.
    • ACCEPTABLE if the donor has fully recovered from malaria for a period of at least 12 months.
    • Registries located in countries with endemic malaria risk may wish to consider a shorter recovery period – e.g. ACCEPTABLE as long as the donor has fully recovered.

  3. Past residence:
    • Previous residence in a malaria risk area or areas for a continuous period of 6 months or longer, at any time of life.
    • ACCEPTABLE

Guidance at CT/WORK-UP

  1. Recent travel:
    • Any travel to a malaria risk area within the past 12 months.
    • ACCEPTABLE, but disclose risk to the transplant centre.
    • Registries located in a country with endemic malaria risk may wish to omit this question, or modify it to capture travel to higher-risk regions within the same country or other countries.
    • Malaria antibody testing, where available, can be useful to evaluate the possibility of symptomless infection following recent risk travel. Note that there have been case reports of relapsing vivax malaria in blood donors where antibody screening has been negative during an asymptomatic interval.

  2. Past infection:
    • A known history of malaria infection at any time of life.
    • ACCEPTABLE if the donor has fully recovered from malaria for a period of at least 12 months. Advise the transplant centre of the potential risk of semi-immunity – particularly if there has been subsequent or ongoing geographical exposure to malaria following recovery.
    • If the donor/registry is located in a country with endemic malaria risk and/or there is no alternative donor available, a shorter recovery period may be considered.
    • Malaria antibody testing, where available, is useful for detecting semi-immunity. In a donor with a past history of infection and subsequent/ongoing geographical exposure, the presence or absence of malaria antibodies is a useful indicator of the possibility of prolonged symptomless infection.
    • A positive antibody result should be further evaluated by testing for the presence of current infection – e.g. malaria PCR or antigen testing.

  3. Past residence:
    • Previous residence in a malaria risk area or areas for a continuous period of 6 months or longer, at any time of life.
    • ACCEPTABLE, but disclose risk to the transplant centre.
    • If the donor remains currently resident in a country with endemic malaria risk, further evaluation of the donor’s individual risk is recommended because the geographic distribution of malaria risk is uneven within most endemic countries, while the likelihood of semi-immunity is increased by childhood and/or repeated exposure.
    • Malaria antibody testing, where available, is useful for detecting semi-immunity. In a donor with a history of past residence in a malaria risk area and subsequent/ongoing geographical exposure, the presence or absence of malaria antibodies is a useful indicator of the possibility of prolonged symptomless infection.
    • A positive antibody result should be further evaluated by testing for the presence of current infection – e.g. malaria PCR or antigen testing.

References

Kitchen AD, Barbara JA, Hewitt PE. Documented cases of post-transfusion malaria occurring in England: a review in relation to current and proposed donor-selection guidelines. Vox Sanguinis. 2005;89(2):77-80

Condition

Malaria (Plasmapodium falciparum, vivax, ovale)

There are three risk factors for malaria, for which each donor should be screened. Click on risk factor for guidance:

Donor has lived in a malaria risk area for 6 or more continuous months at any time of life

Donor has been in a malaria risk area - for any amount of time - within the last 3 years

Donor has past history of malaria (and/or history of unexplained febrile illness following travel to a malarial area)

 

Justification for guidance

Malaria is a human infection caused by Plasmodium parasites of at least five species – P. falciparum, P. vivax, P. ovale, P. malariae and P. knowlesi. The organism infects red cells, and is known to be transmissible through red cell-containing blood products. Instances where an asymptomatic blood donor has transmitted malaria to a recipient have generally resulted from a condition known as “semi-immunity”, whereby a person with long-term exposure to malaria risk – particularly residence in a risk area during early childhood – may be capable of acquiring active infection in the absence of symptoms. Another theoretical concern is the possibility that symptoms of malaria infection may be masked by the use of prophylactic anti-malarial therapy.

Blood donor eligibility guidelines in Europe, Australia and New Zealand now consider semi-immunity to be a risk for donors who have resided in a malaria risk area at any time of life – not just early childhood. Accordingly, blood donors in those regions are now asked if they have ever spent 6 or more continuous months in malaria risk areas. Therefore, we propose that prospective HSC donors who have ever resided in a malaria risk area (for 6 continuous months or more) should be tested for malaria antibodies, or at least considered to be at risk of malaria semi-immunity.Prospective HSC donors who report travel to a malaria risk area within the last 3 years should be tested for malaria antibodies, irrespective of whether they had a fever within the first 6 months, to exclude the risk of sub-clinical malaria infection. This proposal differs from the current criteria, which accept such a donor without testing after 6 months, as long as no febrile episodes are reported during or after their travel exposure. The rationale for tightening these criteria is that a history of fever may be absent in travellers with asymptomatic malaria infection, yet is also a common symptom of other infections. In any case, testing these donors out to 3 years will cover the risk period defined by the current criteria irrespective of fever history, while the question capturing malaria history could easily be modified to also capture “unexplained” fever following travel to a risk area.Conversely, we propose that the current criteria for prospective HSC donors with a history of malaria infection could be relaxed in line with blood donor guidelines in Europe/Australia/New Zealand. Those guidelines derive from the Council of Europe Guide to the preparation, use and quality assurance of blood and blood products (the CoE Guide), and allow the acceptance of a blood donor as little as 4 months after cessation of successful therapy, subject to a negative antibody test.Finally, the current criteria assume a possible “serological window period” of 6 months for the development of malaria antibodies following exposure. The CoE blood donor Guide assumes a window period of 4 months, while the true window period is probably even shorter. In the context of HSC donation, where the prospective donor may be the only potential match for the patient, we propose that each malaria antibody result simply be reported to the treating Dr in conjunction with the reported risk factor and the interval between last exposure/treatment cessation and testing, noting the likely window period for malaria antibody testing.

 

References

Fairhurst RM and Wellems TE. Plasmodium species (malaria). In: Mandell GL, Bennett JE and Dolin R, editors. Mandel, Douglas and Bennett's Principles and Practice of Infectious Diseases, 6th ed. Elsevier Churchill Livingstone, Philadelphia 2005. pp. 3121-3144.

Cox-Singh et al. Plasmodium knowlesi Malaria in humans is widely distributed and potentially life threatening. CID 2008;46:165-171

Stramer SL, Hollinger, FB, Katz, LM, Kleinman, S, Metzel PS, Gregory KR, Dodd, R. Emerging infectious disease agents and their potential threat to transfusion safety. Transfusion. 49. August 2009. Supplement.

Seed CR, Kitchen A and Davis TME. The current status and potential role of laboratory testing to prevent transfusion-transmitted malaria. Transfus Med Rev 2005; 19:229-240.

Seed CR, Cheng A, Davis TME, Bolton WV, Keller AJ, Kitchen A and Cobain TJ. The efficacy of a malarial antibody enzyme immunoassay for establishing the reinstatement status of blood donors potentially exposed to malaria. Vox Sang 2005; 88:98-106.

Doolan DL, Dobaño C, Baird JK. Acquired immunity to malaria. Clinical microbiology reviews. 2009;22(1):13-36, Table of Contents.

Reesink HW, Panzer S, Wendel S, Levi JE, Ullum H, Ekblom-Kulberg S, Seifried E, Schmidt M, Shinar E, Prati D, Berzuini A, Ghosh S, Flesland O, Jeansson S, Zhiburt E, Piron M, Sauleda S, Ekermo B, Eglin R, Kitchen A, Dodd RY, Leiby DA, Katz LM and Kleinman. The use of malaria antibody tests in the prevention of transfusion-transmitted malaria. Vox Sang 2010; 98 (3 Pt 2):468-478.

Seed CR, Coughlin JT, Pickworth AM, Harley RJ and Keller AJ.  Relapsing vivax malaria despite chemoprophylaxis in two blood donors who had travelled to Papua New Guinea.  Med J Aust 2010; 192 (8): 471-473. 

Guide to the Preparation, Use and Quality Assurance of Blood Components. European Committee (Partial Agreement) on Blood Transfusion (CD-P-TS), Council of Europe. 16th Edition, 2011.

 

Notes

Australia: An additional precaution in our Blood Service, which to our knowledge is specific to this country, is that blood donors at high risk of P. vivax infection are ineligible for clearance by antibody testing within 3 years of exposure. In a local context, this is defined as travel to Papua New Guinea (PNG) – a country with a very high risk of vivax malaria in all inhabited areas, yet is a relatively popular travel destination for Australians due to its proximity and historical significance. This precaution was prompted by two cases where a recent visitor to PNG donated blood and tested negative for malaria antibodies, despite later developing relapsing vivax malaria. In a HSCT context the ABMDR has not extended this precaution to HSC donors, as our malaria protocol simply requires testing of any donor reporting a malaria risk, with the results then reported. Accordingly, our suggested WMDA criteria do not require an analogous precaution either.

Kitchen AD, Chiodini PL, Tossell J. Detection of malarial DNA in blood donors--evidence of persistent infection. Vox Sang. 2014;107(2):123-131.

Verra F, Angheben A, Martello E, Giorli G, Perandin F, Bisoffi Z. A systematic review of transfusion-transmitted malaria in non-endemic areas. Malar J. 2018;17(1):36.

O'Brien SF, Ward S, Gallian P, et al. Malaria blood safety policy in five non-endemic countries: a retrospective comparison through the lens of the ABO risk-based decision-making framework. Blood Transfus. 2019;17(2):94-102.

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services FaDA. Revised Recommendations to Reduce the Risk of Transfusion-Transmitted Malaria. In: Research CfBEa, ed. Maryland: Food and Drug Administration; 2020.