Page History

By default, Search & Match performs a 10/10 search for donors if all 5 loci (A,B,C,DRB1,DQB1) are available for the patient. If only 3 or 4 loci are available, the system will scale down to a 6/6 or 8/8 search, respectively. 10/10, 8/8 and 6/6 are all considered as zero mismatch searches and will not include mismatch donors in the results. This is also the case for cord searches. 

Open up the search results for a search you would like to perform a mismatch search. Click "Edit search"  and then select the number of mismatches that you would like to consider at most. Then click "Search" to start that search. 

No, you can only perform a zero mismatch donor or cords search. You will only be able to view/request mismatched donors/CBUs when the initial search results are available. 

If you are experiencing difficulties in your selection of a donor/cord for your patient, you can request a search advice from the WMDA HLA experts. To request an advise, go to your patient list, click on the patient ID and at the bottom of the Update patient form you will find a button with 'Request Search Advisory'. An email message will then open with the patient information and some additional fields with requirements. Please fill out as much as possible and send the email. You will receive the advice also by email.

There is no functional difference. The filters you see on top of the headings in the search results are the frequently used filters. All filters are applied to all search results. Even the ones that are not on the page that is currently displayed. 

The default sorting criteria from Hap-E Search and ATLAS for donors are: 

1. HLA

2. probability in 10% intervals

3. donor age ascending

The default sorting criteria from Hap-E Search and ATLAS for cords are: 

1. HLA (6/6, 5/6, 4/6 categories)

2. Number of total nucleated cells (TNC) for cords within HLA match category

DPB1 TCE3 evaluation is performed only for A-B-DR(B1) typed donors under the following conditions: 

• Patient DPB1 values must be present. Typing ambiguities in the form of multiple alleles codes, G-codes, etc. are allowed.
• Donor DPB1 values must be present. Typing ambiguities in the form of multiple alleles codes, G-codes, etc. are allowed.

As part of the DPB1 TC3 grading filter, you can filter the results by the following options: Matched, Permissive, Non-permissive in HvG direction, Non-permissive in GvH direction, Ambiguous/Undetermined.

Although the DPB1 TC3 filter is available for cords, the results haven't been validated so it shouldn't be used.

The default sorting criteria from Hap-E Search and ATLAS are:

1. HLA

2. probability in 10% intervals

3. donor age in 5 year intervals

This can have several causes.

• Overall match probabilities and locus-specific match probabilities are missing: this is most likely because the HLA typing of the donor/CBU is not consistent with any known haplotypes for the population that the donor is in (inexplicable donor). Without haplotypical context, the matching engine is not able to provide match probabilities. 
• Only locus-specific match probabilities are missing: It does not make sense to display the probability of match for a specific locus in case of a mismatch
  • Because the known match probability is 100% and therefore there is no probability of a(n additional) mismatch and therefore displaying match probabilities in case of an additional mismatch does not make sense.
  • Because the probability of an additional mismatch is 0% for another reason, e.g. because the donor is low resolution typed at 3 loci and therefore in theory be a match, but it is very unlikely.  

See the following page for more information: Feature differences Hap-E Search vs Optimatch

Image Added

In some cases you may see donors or CBUs that look like the one above. There is not information regarding GRID, registry, CBB, age or any other non-HLA/ethnicity information. The reason for this is that the search was in the Hap-E search result, but can no longer be found in our internal database. We are therefore not able to show any additional information other then what the Hap-E matching engine provided.

This can have several causes.

• The search was not recently performed and the patient is not in the ACT state. 
• It is a donor from the Japanese registry (ION-4364). In that case there is registry information available, but all donors seem to be 33 years old and there are no identifiers. This is because Japan Marrow Donor Program does not send any information except for HLA to our systems. 
• It is a donor from the Chinese Marrow Donor Program (ION-2197). In that case there is registry information available, but all donors seem to be 33 years old and there is no GRID. This is because Chinese Marrow Donor Program did not send GRID or birth date in their last upload (2017-11-09)

How to resolve: 

• If the search is not recent, it is best to refresh the searches for a patient. See https://share.wmda.info/x/dZUZGQ for instructions on how to do that. 
• If the donor is from the Japan Marrow Donor Program or Chinese Marrow Donor Program, contact this registry for more information. 

At the top of search results you can see how many donors or CBUs are inexplicable. 
Image Added

Inexplicable donors or CBUs are records that have HLA that cannot be explained by a combination of two haplotypes in the haplotype frequency set (Haplotype frequency sets in the HAP-E matching algorithm of the Search & Match Service) for the population that the donor or CBU is part of. To find out which haplotype frequency set was used, you can use the full report

Image Added

The number there corresponds to the set on the Haplotype frequency sets in the HAP-E matching algorithm of the Search & Match Service share page. 

Because the HLA typing that this donor/CBU has cannot be explained, Hap-E also cannot calculate match probabilities. Currently these donors appear on the bottom of the match class that they are part of (e.g. 10/10, 9/10, 7/8). We are working on a way to move potentially relevant but inexplicable donors to a better place in the search results. 

The number of inexplicable donors/CBUs mentioned therefore serves as a reminder that there are potentially relevant search results available that can be found at the bottom of the match class.